Compliance infrastructure for remittance & cross-border payments
Sanctions and PEP screening, corridor-risk rules and dual-regime readiness — built for operators moving money across borders, including the UK–Nigeria corridor. See how this fits across African cross-border markets more broadly.
The heaviest screening burden and the most jurisdictional complexity
Cross-border operators carry the heaviest screening burden and the most jurisdictional complexity. Sanctions and PEP exposure is constant, corridor risk varies by route, and operators on the UK–Nigeria corridor answer to two regulatory regimes at once — with no single tool built to cover both.
Cross-border compliance without orchestration
- ✗
Screening run separately — not wired into the payment decision
- ✗
Corridor risk rules set globally, not per-route — high-risk routes get the same treatment as low-risk ones
- ✗
Evidence scattered across vendor dashboards, hard to produce for dual-regime queries
- ✗
A provider outage or renewal leaves a screening gap
- ✗
Dual-jurisdiction reporting built manually, not from a structured evidence store
With Fintegrity
- ✓
Screening orchestrated inside every cross-border decision — consistently applied
- ✓
Per-corridor risk rules, versioned and simulatable — respond to newly elevated routes in hours
- ✓
Structured evidence for every screening check and corridor decision
- ✓
Two provider connectors active at once — no gap from a provider switch or outage
- ✓
Evidence structure designed to support documentation requirements on both sides of the corridor
Screening and corridor-risk rules at the corridor step
Fintegrity orchestrates screening into every cross-border decision, applies corridor-specific risk rules, and captures evidence to a standard that holds up to scrutiny on either side of the corridor. Its cross-jurisdiction design is a core differentiator — built to support CBN and FCA concepts in one platform.
Screening, corridor controls and evidence — in one place
Sanctions / PEP / adverse-media orchestrated into the decision
Screening is not a separate check — it is an orchestrated layer inside every cross-border decision, with per-check evidence written automatically. Bring your own provider; no vendor lock-in.
Corridor-risk rules for high-risk routes
Configure elevated scrutiny for specific corridor combinations. Rules are versioned and simulatable — so you can respond to newly elevated-risk routes in hours, not release cycles.
Cross-jurisdiction-ready evidence structure
Evidence is structured to support documentation requirements on both sides of a cross-border corridor — including the UK–Nigeria corridor.
Keep your existing screening data relationships
Connect ComplyAdvantage, LSEG World-Check or another provider with your own credentials. Two connectors can stay active so a provider change or outage never leaves a coverage gap.
Under the hood
Sanctions, PEP and adverse-media screening orchestrated into the decision. BYO provider, two connectors active at once.
Author per-corridor risk rules, simulate against real cross-border transaction history, and deploy in hours.
The synchronous call that returns CLEAR/FLAGGED/HELD_FOR_REVIEW/BLOCKED with full evidence before a cross-border payment executes.
See how Fintegrity evaluates transactions in real time
We'll walk through a live cross-border configuration — corridor-risk rules, BYO screening orchestration, and dual-regime evidence — built around your routes.